1 shops · 0+ products

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 (2026)

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Test profile

BF
Goodrich g-Grip
Kleber
Dynaxer HP3
Number of tests
6
6
Best position
#6
#4
Average position
19.3
19.0
Latest test
2019
2020
Available sizes
119
132

Performance comparison

Wet performance
Confidence
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
BF
Goodrich g-Grip
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
82%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP3
Wet handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
89%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
88%
Wet circle cornering
BF Goodrich g-Grip
98%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
100%
Aquaplaning longitudinal
BF Goodrich g-Grip
87%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
84%
Aquaplaning cross
BF Goodrich g-Grip
78%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
55%
Dry performance
Confidence
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
BF
Goodrich g-Grip
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
94%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP3
Dry handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
94%
Comfort & noise
Confidence
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
BF
Goodrich g-Grip
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
68%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP3
Noise exterior
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
68%
Economy
Confidence
BF Goodrich g-Grip
76%
BF
Goodrich g-Grip
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
71%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP3
Rolling resistance
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
61%
Mileage
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
81%

Performance spider chart

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
θερινές
2018195/65 R15View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Dimension BF Goodrich g-Grip Kleber Dynaxer HP3 %
205/55 R16 — — —
205/55 R16 — — —
205/55 R16 — — —
205/55 R16 — — —
205/55 R16 — — —
View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison