1 shops · 0+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Vredestein Ultrac Pro (2026)

2 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Test profile

Kumho
Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Vredestein
Ultrac Pro
Number of tests
6
11
Best position
#1
#3
Average position
4.7
7.2
Latest test
2026
2026
Available sizes
105
90

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet performance
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
76%
Kumho
Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
74%
Vredestein
Ultrac Pro
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
74%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
69%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
79%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
80%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
80%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
80%
Aquaplaning longitudinal
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
79%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
74%
Aquaplaning cross
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
69%
Dry performance
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Kumho
Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
84%
Vredestein
Ultrac Pro
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
72%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
81%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
70%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
86%
Comfort & noise
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Kumho
Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
83%
Vredestein
Ultrac Pro
Noise exterior
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
83%
Economy
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
74%
Kumho
Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
65%
Vredestein
Ultrac Pro
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
78%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
77%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
53%

Performance spider chart

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
θερινές
2026245/45 R19View
Auto BildAuto Bild
θερινές
2026255/45 R19View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Dimension Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Vredestein Ultrac Pro %
205/55 R16 — — —
205/55 R16 — — —
205/55 R16 — — —
205/55 R16 — — —
205/55 R16 — — —
View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison