1 shops · 0+ products

Comparison: Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) (2026)

2 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Test profile

Vredestein
Ultrac Pro
Kumho
Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Number of tests
11
6
Best position
#3
#1
Average position
7.2
4.7
Latest test
2026
2026
Available sizes
90
105

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet performance
Confidence
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
74%
Vredestein
Ultrac Pro
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
76%
Kumho
Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Wet braking
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
69%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
74%
Wet handling
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
80%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
79%
Wet circle cornering
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
80%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
80%
Aquaplaning longitudinal
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
74%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
79%
Aquaplaning cross
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
69%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Dry performance
Confidence
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
84%
Vredestein
Ultrac Pro
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Kumho
Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Dry braking
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
81%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
72%
Dry handling
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
86%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
70%
Comfort & noise
Confidence
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
83%
Vredestein
Ultrac Pro
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Kumho
Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Noise exterior
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
83%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Economy
Confidence
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
65%
Vredestein
Ultrac Pro
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
74%
Kumho
Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Rolling resistance
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
77%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
78%
Mileage
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
53%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%

Performance spider chart

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
θερινές
2026245/45 R19View
Auto BildAuto Bild
θερινές
2026255/45 R19View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Dimension Vredestein Ultrac Pro Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) %
205/55 R16 — — —
205/55 R16 — — —
205/55 R16 — — —
205/55 R16 — — —
205/55 R16 — — —
View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison