1 shops · 0+ products

Comparison: Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 (2026)

4 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Test profile

Vredestein
ULTRAC
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
10
Best position
#2
Average position
6.0
Latest test
2026
Available sizes
83
117

Performance comparison

Averaged from 4 tests

Wet performance
Confidence
Vredestein ULTRAC
85%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Wet braking
Vredestein ULTRAC
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Wet handling
Vredestein ULTRAC
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Wet circle cornering
Vredestein ULTRAC
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
60%
Aquaplaning longitudinal
Vredestein ULTRAC
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Aquaplaning cross
Vredestein ULTRAC
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Dry performance
Confidence
Vredestein ULTRAC
82%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Kumho Ecsta HS52
82%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Dry braking
Vredestein ULTRAC
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
88%
Dry handling
Vredestein ULTRAC
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Comfort & noise
Confidence
Vredestein ULTRAC
75%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Noise exterior
Vredestein ULTRAC
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
83%
Noise interior
Vredestein ULTRAC
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Ride comfort
Vredestein ULTRAC
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Economy
Confidence
Vredestein ULTRAC
51%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Rolling resistance
Vredestein ULTRAC
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Mileage
Vredestein ULTRAC
45%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
45%

Performance spider chart

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
θερινές
2024205/55 R16View
Autoklub ČRAutoklub ČR
θερινές
2023205/55 R16View
ADACADAC
θερινές
2024215/55 R17View
AutobildAutobild
θερινές
2022215/55 R17View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Dimension Vredestein ULTRAC Kumho Ecsta HS52 %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison