Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth ES-32 vs. Falken Azenis FK520 (2026)
Also compare with
These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.
Falken Azenis FK520Falken Azenis FK520Falken Azenis FK520Falken Azenis FK520Falken Azenis FK520Falken Azenis FK520Falken Azenis FK520Falken Azenis FK520Falken Azenis FK520Falken Azenis FK520Falken Azenis FK520Falken Azenis FK520Falken Azenis FK520Falken Azenis FK520Falken Azenis FK520Falken Azenis FK520Falken Azenis FK520Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
| Dimension | Yokohama BluEarth ES-32 | Falken Azenis FK520 | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 205/55 R16 | — | — | — |
| 205/55 R16 | — | — | — |
| 205/55 R16 | — | — | — |
| 205/55 R16 | — | — | — |
| 205/55 R16 | — | — | — |
VS
VSVSVS
VSVSVSVS
VS
VS
Yokohama BluEarth ES-32 vs Nankang Sportnex AS-2+
Yokohama BluEarth ES-32 vs Avon ZV7
Yokohama BluEarth ES-32 vs Viking Protech NewGen
Yokohama BluEarth ES-32 vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro+Falken Azenis FK520 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6Falken Azenis FK520 vs Bridgestone Potenza SportFalken Azenis FK520 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5Falken Azenis FK520 vs Continental SportContact 7
