σύγκριση: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 εναντίον. Sava Eskimo HP2 εναντίον. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 εναντίον. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

ανώτερο-μεσαίο

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

VS

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Eskimo HP2

Blizzak LM-005

UltraGrip Performance+

Αριθμός δοκιμών

23

15

49

23

Best position

#1

#6

#1

Average position

6.7

15.5

3.2

3.3

Latest test

2025

2024

2025

Available sizes

107

28

213

176

Performance comparison

Απόδοση σε βρεγμένο οδόστρωμα

87%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

70%

Sava

Eskimo HP2

91%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

94%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

πέδηση σε υγρό οδόστρωμα

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Sava Eskimo HP2

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

97%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

92%

υγρός χειρισμός

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

79%

Sava Eskimo HP2

63%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

95%

στροφές σε υγρό κύκλο

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

84%

Sava Eskimo HP2

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

95%

Aquaplaning longitudinal

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

100%

Sava Eskimo HP2

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Aquaplaning cross

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

92%

Sava Eskimo HP2

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

97%

ξηρή απόδοση

77%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Sava

Eskimo HP2

91%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

86%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

ξηρό φρενάρισμα

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Sava Eskimo HP2

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

ξηρός χειρισμός

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Sava Eskimo HP2

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Απόδοση σε χιόνι

92%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

89%

Sava

Eskimo HP2

79%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

91%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

πέδηση σε χιόνι

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

97%

Sava Eskimo HP2

97%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

97%

πρόσφυση στο χιόνι

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

97%

Sava Eskimo HP2

92%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

97%

χειρισμός χιονιού

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

87%

Sava Eskimo HP2

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Snow circle cornering

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

87%

Sava Eskimo HP2

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Comfort & noise

90%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

76%

Sava

Eskimo HP2

84%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

92%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

Noise exterior

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

95%

Sava Eskimo HP2

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Ride comfort

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

84%

Sava Eskimo HP2

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

95%

οικονομία

80%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Sava

Eskimo HP2

86%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

83%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

αντίσταση κύλισης

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Sava Eskimo HP2

92%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

χιλιομετρική απόσταση

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

79%

Sava Eskimo HP2

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Tests used in comparison

οργάνωση	Season	έτος	διάσταση
Autobild	χειμώνας	2019	225/45 R17	View

διαστάσεις και τιμές

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

σύγκριση: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 εναντίον. Sava Eskimo HP2 εναντίον. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 εναντίον. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Eskimo HP2

Blizzak LM-005

UltraGrip Performance+

Test profile

Performance comparison

Tests used in comparison

διαστάσεις και τιμές

προσθέστε στη σύγκριση