σύγκριση: Continental EcoContact 6 εναντίον. Firestone Roadhawk εναντίον. Kumho Ecsta HS52 εναντίον. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Premium

Continental

EcoContact 6

R13 – R23

VS

ανώτερο-μεσαίο

Firestone

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

UltraContact NXT

Test profile

EcoContact 6

Roadhawk

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Αριθμός δοκιμών

5

21

10

3

Best position

#7

#2

Average position

13.0

11.9

6.0

3.3

Latest test

2022

2024

2026

Available sizes

676

164

104

40

υγρό

Continental EcoContact 6

60%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

στροφές σε υγρό κύκλο

Continental EcoContact 6

69%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

υγρός χειρισμός

Continental EcoContact 6

57%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

υδροσυλλογή - σταυρός

Continental EcoContact 6

40%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

πέδηση σε υγρό οδόστρωμα

Continental EcoContact 6

66%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

υδροσυλλογή - διαμήκης

Continental EcoContact 6

61%

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Απόδοση σε βρεγμένο οδόστρωμα

Continental EcoContact 6

73%

Firestone Roadhawk

24%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

55%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

ξηρό

Continental EcoContact 6

77%

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

ξηρό φρενάρισμα

Continental EcoContact 6

78%

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

ξηρός χειρισμός

Continental EcoContact 6

70%

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

ξηρή οδηγική συμπεριφορά

Continental EcoContact 6

73%

Firestone Roadhawk

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

ξηρή απόδοση

Continental EcoContact 6

86%

Firestone Roadhawk

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

άνεση

Continental EcoContact 6

84%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

εξωτερικός θόρυβος

Continental EcoContact 6

85%

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

άνεση

Continental EcoContact 6

78%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

εσωτερικός θόρυβος

Continental EcoContact 6

83%

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

κόστος

Continental EcoContact 6

93%

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

αποδοτικότητα καυσίμου

Continental EcoContact 6

99%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

χιλιομετρική απόσταση

Continental EcoContact 6

89%

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

αντίσταση κύλισης

Continental EcoContact 6

100%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

τιμή/αξία

Continental EcoContact 6

71%

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

διαστάσεις και τιμές

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

σύγκριση: Continental EcoContact 6 εναντίον. Firestone Roadhawk εναντίον. Kumho Ecsta HS52 εναντίον. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

EcoContact 6

Roadhawk

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

υγρό

ξηρό

άνεση

κόστος

διαστάσεις και τιμές

προσθέστε στη σύγκριση