σύγκριση: Continental UltraContact NXT εναντίον. Falken e.Ziex εναντίον. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 εναντίον. Bridgestone Turanza T005 εναντίον. Hankook ION Evo

Premium

Continental

UltraContact NXT

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test profile

UltraContact NXT

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Turanza T005

ION Evo

Αριθμός δοκιμών

2

3

33

1

Best position

#1

#2

#1

Average position

1.0

3.7

3.3

4.1

1.0

Latest test

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

23

34

40

658

64

υγρό

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

82%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

υδροσυλλογή - διαμήκης

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

78%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

υγρός χειρισμός

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

πέδηση σε υγρό οδόστρωμα

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

υδροσυλλογή - σταυρός

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

73%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

οδηγός υγρής πλευράς

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

84%

στροφές σε υγρό κύκλο

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

ξηρό

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

83%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

ξηρό φρενάρισμα

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

ξηρός χειρισμός

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

ξηρή αλλαγή λωρίδας

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

84%

ξηρή απόκριση του τιμονιού

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

82%

άνεση

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

76%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

εξωτερικός θόρυβος

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

62%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

άνεση

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

81%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

κόστος

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

81%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

αντίσταση κύλισης

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

93%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

διαστάσεις και τιμές

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

σύγκριση: Continental UltraContact NXT εναντίον. Falken e.Ziex εναντίον. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 εναντίον. Bridgestone Turanza T005 εναντίον. Hankook ION Evo

UltraContact NXT

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Turanza T005

ION Evo

Test profile

υγρό

ξηρό

άνεση

κόστος

διαστάσεις και τιμές

προσθέστε στη σύγκριση