σύγκριση: Firestone Roadhawk εναντίον. Falken e.Ziex εναντίον. Continental UltraContact NXT εναντίον. Hankook ION Evo εναντίον. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

ανώτερο-μεσαίο

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test profile

Roadhawk

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Αριθμός δοκιμών

21

3

2

1

3

Best position

#2

#1

#2

Average position

11.9

3.7

1.0

3.3

Latest test

2024

2025

2026

Available sizes

164

34

23

64

40

υγρό

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

υδροσυλλογή - σταυρός

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

υδροσυλλογή - διαμήκης

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

πέδηση σε υγρό οδόστρωμα

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

υγρός χειρισμός

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

στροφές σε υγρό κύκλο

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

οδηγός υγρής πλευράς

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

ξηρό

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

ξηρό φρενάρισμα

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

ξηρός χειρισμός

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

άνεση

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

εξωτερικός θόρυβος

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

άνεση

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

κόστος

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

χιλιομετρική απόσταση

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

αντίσταση κύλισης

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

τιμή/αξία

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

διαστάσεις και τιμές

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

σύγκριση: Firestone Roadhawk εναντίον. Falken e.Ziex εναντίον. Continental UltraContact NXT εναντίον. Hankook ION Evo εναντίον. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Roadhawk

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

υγρό

ξηρό

άνεση

κόστος

διαστάσεις και τιμές

προσθέστε στη σύγκριση