σύγκριση: Kumho Ecsta HS52 εναντίον. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 εναντίον. Falken e.Ziex εναντίον. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 εναντίον. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

ανώτερο-μεσαίο

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test profile

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Blizzak 6

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Αριθμός δοκιμών

10

3

14

5

Best position

#2

#1

Average position

6.0

3.3

3.7

3.6

2.2

Latest test

2026

2025

Available sizes

104

40

34

188

63

υγρό

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

πέδηση σε υγρό οδόστρωμα

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

υδροσυλλογή - σταυρός

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

υδροσυλλογή - διαμήκης

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

στροφές σε υγρό κύκλο

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

υγρός χειρισμός

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Απόδοση σε βρεγμένο οδόστρωμα

Kumho Ecsta HS52

55%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

άνεση

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

εξωτερικός θόρυβος

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

άνεση

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

εσωτερικός θόρυβος

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

ξηρό

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

ξηρό φρενάρισμα

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

ξηρός χειρισμός

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

ξηρή απόδοση

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

59%

κόστος

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

αντίσταση κύλισης

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

χιλιομετρική απόσταση

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

τιμή/αξία

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

διαστάσεις και τιμές

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

σύγκριση: Kumho Ecsta HS52 εναντίον. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 εναντίον. Falken e.Ziex εναντίον. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 εναντίον. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Blizzak 6

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test profile

υγρό

άνεση

ξηρό

κόστος

διαστάσεις και τιμές

προσθέστε στη σύγκριση