1 shops · 0+ products

Comparison: Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ vs. Vredestein Quatrac (2026)

Test profile

Kumho
Solus 4S HA32+
Vredestein
Quatrac
Number of tests
3
18
Best position
#5
#1
Average position
9.3
3.1
Latest test
2026
2026
Available sizes
19
60

These tyres were not tested together. the comparison below is inferred from separate tests by normalizing both tyres against 5 shared benchmark tyres, so treat it as an estimate.

Dry
Confidence
Kumho Solus 4S HA32+
94%
Vredestein Quatrac
100%
Dry braking
Kumho Solus 4S HA32+
92%
Vredestein Quatrac
100%
Dry handling
Kumho Solus 4S HA32+
95%
Vredestein Quatrac
100%
Wet
Confidence
Kumho Solus 4S HA32+
89%
Vredestein Quatrac
100%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Solus 4S HA32+
59%
Vredestein Quatrac
100%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Solus 4S HA32+
82%
Vredestein Quatrac
100%
Wet braking
Kumho Solus 4S HA32+
99%
Vredestein Quatrac
100%
Wet handling
Kumho Solus 4S HA32+
96%
Vredestein Quatrac
100%
Snow
Confidence
Kumho Solus 4S HA32+
94%
Vredestein Quatrac
100%
Snow braking
Kumho Solus 4S HA32+
100%
Vredestein Quatrac
97%
Snow handling
Kumho Solus 4S HA32+
93%
Vredestein Quatrac
100%
Snow traction
Kumho Solus 4S HA32+
94%
Vredestein Quatrac
100%
Comfort
Confidence
Kumho Solus 4S HA32+
87%
Vredestein Quatrac
100%
Comfort
Kumho Solus 4S HA32+
91%
Vredestein Quatrac
100%
Interior noise
Kumho Solus 4S HA32+
82%
Vredestein Quatrac
100%
Costs
Confidence
Kumho Solus 4S HA32+
100%
Vredestein Quatrac
97%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Solus 4S HA32+
100%
Vredestein Quatrac
97%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Dimension Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ Vredestein Quatrac %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AUTOBILDAUTOBILD
Τεσσάρων εποχών
2024225/50 R17View
ADACADAC
Τεσσάρων εποχών
2024205/55 R16View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison