1 Shops · 0+ Products

σύγκριση: Michelin Energy Saver + εναντίον. Firestone Roadhawk 2 εναντίον. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Αριθμός δοκιμών
4
6
3
Best position
#5
#3
#2
Average position
10.3
4.7
3.3
Latest test
2018
2026
2026
Available sizes
146
40

υγρό

υγρό
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
υδροσυλλογή - σταυρός
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
υδροσυλλογή - διαμήκης
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
στροφές σε υγρό κύκλο
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
υγρός χειρισμός
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%

κόστος

κόστος
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
αντίσταση κύλισης
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
χιλιομετρική απόσταση
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

άνεση

άνεση
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
εξωτερικός θόρυβος
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

ξηρό

ξηρό
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
ξηρός χειρισμός
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

διαστάσεις και τιμές

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

προσθέστε στη σύγκριση

Popular brands
νέα σύγκριση