σύγκριση: Nokian Powerproof εναντίον. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 εναντίον. Bridgestone Potenza Sport εναντίον. Falken e.Ziex

ανώτερο-μεσαίο

Nokian

Powerproof

R17 – R20

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test profile

Powerproof

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Potenza Sport

e.Ziex

Αριθμός δοκιμών

11

3

23

3

Best position

#2

#1

#2

Average position

7.5

3.3

3.7

Latest test

2022

2026

2025

Available sizes

53

40

187

34

υγρό

Nokian Powerproof

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

υδροσυλλογή - διαμήκης

Nokian Powerproof

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

79%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

πέδηση σε υγρό οδόστρωμα

Nokian Powerproof

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

86%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

υγρός χειρισμός

Nokian Powerproof

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

93%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

υδροσυλλογή - σταυρός

Nokian Powerproof

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

75%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

στροφές σε υγρό κύκλο

Nokian Powerproof

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

οδηγός υγρής πλευράς

Nokian Powerproof

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

94%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

ξηρό

Nokian Powerproof

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

88%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

ξηρό φρενάρισμα

Nokian Powerproof

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

88%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

ξηρός χειρισμός

Nokian Powerproof

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

85%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

ξηρή αλλαγή λωρίδας

Nokian Powerproof

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

86%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

ξηρή απόκριση του τιμονιού

Nokian Powerproof

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

97%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Offroad

Nokian Powerproof

90%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

82%

άνεση

Nokian Powerproof

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

80%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

εξωτερικός θόρυβος

Nokian Powerproof

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

άνεση

Nokian Powerproof

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

79%

εσωτερικός θόρυβος

Nokian Powerproof

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

93%

κόστος

Nokian Powerproof

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

61%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

αντίσταση κύλισης

Nokian Powerproof

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

58%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

χιλιομετρική απόσταση

Nokian Powerproof

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

85%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

τιμή/αξία

Nokian Powerproof

50%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

63%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

διαστάσεις και τιμές

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

σύγκριση: Nokian Powerproof εναντίον. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 εναντίον. Bridgestone Potenza Sport εναντίον. Falken e.Ziex

Powerproof

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Potenza Sport

e.Ziex

Test profile

υγρό

ξηρό

Offroad

άνεση

κόστος

διαστάσεις και τιμές

προσθέστε στη σύγκριση