σύγκριση: Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 εναντίον. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance εναντίον. Sava Intensa HP

Performance comparison

Wet performance
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
86%
Continental
ContiPremiumContact 5
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
85%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Sava Intensa HP
71%
Sava
Intensa HP
πέδηση σε υγρό οδόστρωμα
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
Sava Intensa HP
88%
υγρός χειρισμός
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Sava Intensa HP
57%
στροφές σε υγρό κύκλο
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Sava Intensa HP
67%
Aquaplaning longitudinal
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Sava Intensa HP
72%
Aquaplaning cross
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Sava Intensa HP
72%
Comfort & noise
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
72%
Continental
ContiPremiumContact 5
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Sava Intensa HP
71%
Sava
Intensa HP
Noise exterior
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
56%
Sava Intensa HP
64%
Noise interior
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
72%
Sava Intensa HP
77%
Best in category: GT Radial Champiro FE1 (78.5%)
οικονομία
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
68%
Continental
ContiPremiumContact 5
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
74%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Sava Intensa HP
81%
Sava
Intensa HP
αποδοτικότητα καυσίμου
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Sava Intensa HP
82%
χιλιομετρική απόσταση
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
60%
Sava Intensa HP
80%
Best in category: Michelin Energy Saver+ (94.5%)

διαστάσεις και τιμές

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

προσθέστε στη σύγκριση