σύγκριση: Continental PremiumContact 7 εναντίον. Kumho Ecsta HS52 εναντίον. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun εναντίον. Vredestein ULTRAC

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 Premium

2. Vredestein ULTRAC Premium

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ανώτερο-μεσαίο

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun ανώτερο-μεσαίο

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 194

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 81

4. Continental PremiumContact 7 66

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 25x

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 23x

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 16x

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 1.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 2.

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2.

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 8.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 15.

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 20.

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 2.24

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 6.57

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 7.25

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 2026

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2025

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 2025

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 νικητής του τεστ

2. Vredestein ULTRAC συνιστάται ανεπιφύλακτα

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun υποδειγματικό

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 καλή

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 καλή

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 καλή

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun εξακολουθεί να συνιστάται

4. Vredestein ULTRAC επαρκές

Vredestein
ULTRAC

85%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

77%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

71%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

70%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 97%

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 70%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 68%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 66%

1. Vredestein ULTRAC 95%

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 76%

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 71%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 70%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 95%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 81%

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 78%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 59%

1. Vredestein ULTRAC 98%

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 88%

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 61%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 59%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 92%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 82%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 65%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 A

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun B

4. Vredestein ULTRAC ?

Vredestein
ULTRAC

84%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

81%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

76%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

74%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 92%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 90%

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 88%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 75%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 97%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 81%

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 81%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 78%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

75%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

74%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

67%

Vredestein
ULTRAC

40%

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 75%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 69%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 65%

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 56%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 83%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 81%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 59%

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 24%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 C

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun E

4. Vredestein ULTRAC ?

Continental
PremiumContact 7

83%

Vredestein
ULTRAC

80%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

74%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

61%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 90%

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 82%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 63%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 76%

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 75%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 68%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 ?

2. Vredestein ULTRAC ?

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun ? dB