σύγκριση: Kumho Ecsta HS52 εναντίον. Vredestein ULTRAC εναντίον. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun εναντίον. Nokian Powerproof

1. Vredestein ULTRAC Premium

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ανώτερο-μεσαίο

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun ανώτερο-μεσαίο

4. Nokian Powerproof ανώτερο-μεσαίο

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 194

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 81

4. Nokian Powerproof 53

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 23x

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 16x

3. Nokian Powerproof 11x

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

1. Nokian Powerproof 2.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 2.

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2.

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 15.

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 20.

4. Nokian Powerproof 21.

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 6.57

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 7.25

4. Nokian Powerproof 7.45

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2025

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 2025

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

4. Nokian Powerproof 2022

1. Vredestein ULTRAC συνιστάται ανεπιφύλακτα

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun υποδειγματικό

3. Nokian Powerproof υποδειγματικό

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 καλή

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 καλή

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun εξακολουθεί να συνιστάται

3. Nokian Powerproof συνιστάται υπό όρους

4. Vredestein ULTRAC επαρκές

Vredestein
ULTRAC

85%

Nokian
Powerproof

82%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

76%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

73%

1. Vredestein ULTRAC 96%

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 87%

3. Nokian Powerproof 69%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 59%

1. Vredestein ULTRAC 93%

2. Nokian Powerproof 86%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 82%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 72%

1. Nokian Powerproof 88%

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 76%

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 77%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 84%

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 82%

3. Nokian Powerproof 79%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 73%

1. Nokian Powerproof 88%

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 81%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 77%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 63%

1. Nokian Powerproof A

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun B

4. Vredestein ULTRAC ?

Vredestein
ULTRAC

78%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

74%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

68%

Nokian
Powerproof

62%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 70%

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 71%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 71%

4. Nokian Powerproof 57%

1. Vredestein ULTRAC 82%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 63%

4. Nokian Powerproof 0%

1. Vredestein ULTRAC ?

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

3. Nokian Powerproof ?

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun ? dB

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

67%

Vredestein
ULTRAC

52%

Nokian
Powerproof

43%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 63%

2. Nokian Powerproof 59%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 59%

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 57%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 78%

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 59%

3. Nokian Powerproof 38%

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 29%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

2. Nokian Powerproof C

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun E

4. Vredestein ULTRAC ?

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

84%

Vredestein
ULTRAC

82%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

78%

Nokian
Powerproof

75%

1. Nokian Powerproof 90%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 84%

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 80%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 78%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 85%

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 85%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 78%

4. Nokian Powerproof 59%